The United Nations building in New York. (Credit: palinchak/Bigstock)
The United Nations building in New York. (Credit: palinchak/Bigstock) (via:

From its very beginning, the system of collective security established under the United Nations Charter has been dysfunctional.

Global Security Architecture

In the post-World War Two era, global consequences of this systemic failure were mitigated due to the bipolar balance of power that implied mutual deterrence. Under circumstances of unipolarity, however, the statutory privilege of the five permanent members of the Security Council has made the reality of power politics painfully obvious: namely, that enforceable legal constraints on the use of force only exist for the actions of the Council’s non-permanent members, provided the permanent members agree.

This statutory framework cannot be qualified as a system of ‘collective’ security. Unilateral uses of force – since the end of the Cold War – by the world’s most powerful actor (and its allies), with devastating consequences for regional and international security, are ample proof of this.

The security architecture at the global level must not be seen in a vacuum. It is not unenforceable legal norms (such as a general ban on the use of force) but an effective balance of power that is crucial for peace among sovereign states. Too much is at stake in the nuclear era. In a situation where the threat of nuclear activity by an otherwise weak state, fearing for its survival, can offset the entire geopolitical balance, the community of nations must undertake credible efforts towards solving disputes in regions (e.g., the Middle East, South or East Asia) where nuclear weapons may be seen as insurance for national survival.

The security architecture of the future must, therefore, be based on effective regional arrangements, alleviating the security concerns of smaller states, and on a multipolar balance of power among the global regions.

Previous articleReading ‘migration and mobility’ in Latin America
Next articleRhodes Forum Policy Recommendations
Hans Koechler

Founder and president of the International Progress Organization (IPO),

Dr. Hans Koechler is professor of the University of Innsbruck (Austria) and holds the Chair of Political Philosophy and Philosophical Anthropology. He is the founder and President of the International Progress Organization (I.P.O.), an NGO in consultative status with the United Nations, and a member of the International Coordinating Committee of the World Public Forum «Dialogue of Civilizations». Dr. Koechler is the author or editor of numerous articles and books, including «Democracy and the International Rule of Law», «Global Justice or Global Revenge?» «International Criminal Justice at the Crossroads» and «World Order: Vision and Reality». He serves as editor of the series "Studies in International Relations" and member of the Editorial Board of several journals, including «Wisdom and Philosophy» (Tehran) and the Indian «Journal of Politics». In 2000, he was nominated by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan as international observer at the Scottish Court in the Netherlands (“Lockerbie Trial”). Dr. Koechler has received numerous honours and awards, including doctor degrees honoris causa from Mindanao State University (Philippines) and Armenian State Pedagogical University, and an honorary professorship from Pamukkale University (Turkey).